The 2015 QER didn’t panic. It observed. And in doing so, it reoriented the conversation from How much energy do we have? to When do we have it, and can we move it in time?
The QER’s first installment, released in April, focused on energy transmission, storage, and distribution. On paper, that sounds technical. In reality, it marked the first time a major U.S. energy policy document implicitly asked: What happens when the sun sets? quadrennial energy review 2015
In energy, as in sports, some of the best moves happen off the ball. In 2015, the U.S. began learning to dance with the sun. And the duck? It’s still quacking. Louder every year. Quadrennial Energy Review 2015: Transforming the Nation’s Electricity System — Key takeaway: Flexibility is the new fuel. The 2015 QER didn’t panic
Here’s a short, interesting piece written in the style of a thought-provoking editorial or feature sidebar for a Quadrennial Energy Review 2015 —focusing on a theme that was both urgent and underappreciated at the time. If you search for images from the 2015 Quadrennial Energy Review (QER), you’ll find charts. Bar graphs of generation capacity. Tables of pipeline miles. But one chart—perhaps the most important of the year—looked less like infrastructure and more like a waterfowl. The “Duck Curve,” popularized by California’s grid operator, was no longer a future warning. In 2015, it began to quack. to When do we have it, and can we move it in time