This is a specific and interesting request because occupies a unique place in the history of linguistic reference works. It is not as encyclopedic as Ducrot & Todorov, nor as purely pedagogical as a textbook glossary.
The physical book has a terrible layout (dense, tiny fonts, no illustrations). The PDF actually improves it. You can Ctrl+F for "Saussure" and see how his shadow looms over every other page. You can screenshot the famous "communication circuit" diagram (one of the few images) and paste it into a lecture slide. The Warnings (The Bad & The Obsolete) 1. The Missing Decades (1975–Present) Here is the elephant in the library. If you search for "Generative Grammar" (Grammaire générative), Mounin treats it like a promising but dangerous teenage fad. There is no Cognitive Linguistics. No Discourse Analysis as we know it. No Corpus Linguistics. The PDF is brilliant for history of ideas but dangerous if you think it is a current reference. You will find no definition of "Construction Grammar" or "Emergent Grammar." georges mounin dictionnaire de la linguistique pdf
Mounin was a giant, but he was a French giant. The dictionary heavily favors the Paris School. American structuralism (Bloomfield) is mentioned, but often dismissively. Hjelmslev gets more space than Chomsky. If you are an English-speaking student looking for a universal dictionary, this PDF will feel provincial. It is the dictionary of French linguistics, not world linguistics. This is a specific and interesting request because
Most dictionaries define terms. Mounin often defines schools . Look up "Fonctionnalisme." In an English dictionary, you get a paragraph. In Mounin, you get a dense, historical mini-essay linking the Prague School to Martinet. The PDF is a joy to search for terms like cratylisme or glossématique because Mounin assumes you are an advanced student who already knows the basics. The PDF actually improves it
Unlike modern dictionaries (Crystal, Trask) that attempt a balanced, synoptic view, Mounin’s dictionary is a . What You Actually Get (The Good) 1. The "Signe" is Sovereign Open any page. The influence of Saussure, Martinet, and Benveniste is absolute. For Mounin, linguistics is not about psychological reality (Chomsky) or computation; it is about systems , oppositions , and substance vs. form . If you want a crystal-clear, brutally French definition of signifiant/signifié , this is your bible. The PDF gives you access to that pre-Chomskyan, European flavor of linguistics that is often lost in modern English-centric texts.