This technique transforms the courtroom into a public forum. The legal victory or loss becomes secondary. What matters is that the argument is made—that someone on network television explicitly stated, “Corporations are sociopaths” or “The war on terror has destroyed habeas corpus.” The show’s frequent losses (Alan loses as often as he wins) reinforce a central thesis: justice is not about winning cases but about bearing witness.
Boston Legal revolutionized the televised closing argument. Traditional legal dramas use the closing to summarize evidence. Kelley uses it as a direct address to the audience, bypassing the fictional jury. In episodes like “Death Be Not Proud” (S2E27), where Alan defends a terminally ill man accused of murdering a right-to-life activist, the closing argument is not about the facts of the case but about the existential right to die. boston legal all seasons
Boston Legal argues that the ideal lawyer is not a winner, not a saint, and not a legal scholar. The ideal lawyer is a witness—a rhetorician who uses the machinery of the law to expose the machinery’s own lies. Alan Shore and Denny Crane, for all their flaws, are the last honest lawyers on television because they admit what others hide: that the law is a story we tell ourselves to avoid the dark. And they choose to tell it beautifully, absurdly, and together. This technique transforms the courtroom into a public forum