All The Money In The World May 2026

The brilliant choice of casting in the film—Christopher Plummer as the aged, reptilian Getty—shows a man who has lived so long inside the fortress of capital that he has forgotten that the walls contain people. He negotiates with the kidnappers like they are OPEC officials. He haggles over the tax-deductibility of the ransom. He eventually agrees to loan the family the money—not give it, loan it—at 4% interest.

Ridley Scott’s 2017 film, All the Money in the World , based on the harrowing true story of the 1973 kidnapping of 16-year-old John Paul Getty III, is not merely a thriller about a ransom gone wrong. It is a philosophical horror show. It is a scalpel dissecting the diseased logic of extreme capitalism. It asks a question so simple it seems naive, yet so profound it haunts you long after the credits roll: What is the actual value of a human life when you have all the money in the world? All the Money in the World

We have a collective obsession with the ultra-wealthy. We scroll through lists of billionaires, watch reality shows about lavish lifestyles, and fantasize about what we would do if we won the lottery. We imagine that freedom is a bank balance with twelve zeros. We tell ourselves that if we just had enough —enough to never check a price tag, enough to buy healthcare, safety, and time—we would finally be happy. The brilliant choice of casting in the film—Christopher

Then there is the story of J. Paul Getty. He eventually agrees to loan the family the

They cut off his ear.

In that single line, the thesis is complete. For Getty, the kidnapping was never a crime against his bloodline. It was a failed transaction. The boy’s ear was not a piece of human flesh; it was a market fluctuation. He genuinely believed that a damaged product should be sold at a discount.